Traverse City Record-Eagle

Other Views

March 22, 2014

Another View: Not time to cut funding for Great Lakes

Mother Nature gets credit for a big assist in the fight to keep the Great Lakes healthy, with ice coverage now topping 92 percent for the first time in nearly four decades.

The long, cold winter means the lakes are far above the 50 percent to 60 percent ice coverage they have been experiencing in recent years, and that should mean higher lake levels this spring and summer.

It’s a step in the right direction but not a complete recovery from the evaporation that has dropped lake levels to near-historic lows as of late.

But the lakes won’t get as much help from Washington this year if President Barack Obama’s proposed budget holds. Since 2010, the administration has asked for $300 million annually to fund the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative. But the fiscal year 2015 budget calls for cutting the allocation by $25 million.

The reason is simple: across-the-board belt-tightening. Most programs got a cut of some kind in the president’s budget, and administration officials have made clear that the reduction for the Great Lakes initiative isn’t about substance or disapproval of the program, it’s just about money.

We suppose that’s reasonable by financial measures; nearly everyone believes the federal budget can be trimmed.

But the Great Lakes are this region’s most significant environmental treasure and priority, and they’re in trouble. If ever there were a time to maintain or boost preservation efforts, it would be now.

Back in 2009, congressional backing for Great Lakes clean-up projects had hit a wall. Congress passed the Great Lakes Legacy Act in 2002, and reauthorized it in 2008, but funding and coordination were still big problems.

The Obama administration created the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative in 2009, and kicked it off with a $475-million allocation, which dropped to $300 million a year after that.

Text Only