Traverse City Record-Eagle

Opinion

May 9, 2014

Another View: Approval of practice remains problematical

We’re not sure if (the) Supreme Court ruling on prayer at public meetings makes much difference.

For one thing, it came in one of those increasingly problematical 5-4 decisions this court is famous for presenting. That lack of decisiveness is a blot on the court’s credibility — suggesting constitutional law is little more than an ideological jump ball subject to dramatic change with the switch of a single justice.

But for the issue at hand, such prayers are hardly rare, particularly in smaller municipalities. In those cases, communities may be less diverse and fewer people are likely to object.

In a larger city, any attempt to conduct a prayer at a government meeting is more likely to create controversy from those who hold differing beliefs.

The court majority declared that prayers at town council meetings do not violate the Constitution, so long as they refrain from denigrating particular religions.

We assume those who support the notion of linking government and religion will take comfort in this ruling — at least until they hear of prayers at government sessions for religions that differ from theirs. The court ruling may protect Christian prayers at public meetings, but it basically does the same for prayers of all faiths.

For the most part and in most communities, nothing much will change as a result of this decision. But considering the size and diversity of America, we can almost guarantee there will be disputes.

We envision battles erupting when council members of different faiths seek the supposed advantage of prayer, and their desires conflict with each other. And what happens when a citizen in attendance openly objects, or uses the opportunity for public comment to pray to a different deity?

We happen to believe the separation of church and state has served America well throughout its history. Yes, there are anti-religious extremists who seek to do mischief in a variety of ways. But a basic reading of the Constitution clearly shows that while the founders welcomed the free exercise of religion by individuals and their churches, there was no effort to tie religion to the actions of government.

Text Only

Opinion Poll
AP Video
Raw: Israel Bombs Multiple Targets in Gaza Veteran Creates Job During High Unemployment Raw: Cargo Craft Undocks From Space Station Widow: Jury Sent Big Tobacco a $23B Message New Orleans Plans to Recycle Cigarette Butts UN Security Council Calls for MH 17 Crash Probe Obama Bestows Medal of Honor on NH Veteran Texas Sending National Guard Troops to Border Hopkins to Pay $190M After Pelvic Exams Taped Foxx Cites Washington 'Circus Mirror' NASA Ceremony Honors Moon Walker Neil Armstrong Obama Voices Concern About Casualties in Mideast Diplomacy Intensifies Amid Mounting Gaza Toll AP Exclusive: American Beaten in Israel Speaks Obama Protects Gay, Transgender Workers Raw: Gaza Rescuers Search Rubble for Survivors Raw: International Team Inspects MH17 Bodies Raw: 25 Family Members Killed in Gaza Airstrike US Teen Beaten in Mideast Talks About Ordeal 'Weird Al' Is Wowed by Album's Success