TRAVERSE CITY — A downstate prosecutor said he can't prove a former Meijer Inc. lawyer lied under oath during proceedings for a local official's lawsuit against the retail giant.
Kent County Prosecutor William A. Forsyth won't issue a perjury charge against former Meijer attorney Timothy Stoepker of Dickinson Wright PLLC in Grand Rapids. Grand Traverse County Prosecutor Al Schneider asked Forsyth to investigate because the incident occurred during a deposition in Kent County in 2007.
Forsyth said there's not enough evidence Stoepker committed perjury, especially since questions that prompted the alleged perjury were "ambiguous, compound and imprecise."
"Although ... questions were perfectly legitimate, their ambiguity eliminates the possibility of proving perjury beyond a reasonable doubt," Forsyth wrote in a statement. "As such, we decline to authorize charges or to conduct any further investigation."
Schneider didn't argue with Forysth's decision.
"I'm not surprised. It's a reasonable response," Schneider said. "The questions were not artfully put to the witness, and the prosecutor's last remark was that the ambiguity and imprecision would not lead to proof beyond a reasonable doubt ... that's a reasonable assessment."
Former Acme Township Treasurer Bill Boltres filed a harassment suit against Meijer in 2007 after the retailer sued him and other Acme officials for opposing a proposed new store on M-72 in the township.
The suit revealed that Meijer hired a public relations firm to run a secret and illegal campaign to recall the Acme Township board in 2007, and earlier spent money to sway a 2005 referendum election.
Stoepker testified under oath in a videotaped deposition in Boltres' suit that he had no knowledge of Meijer's involvement in the 2005 election.
Stoepker answered: "I have no knowledge of that at all" when asked "Can you tell me how big a role Meijer took in the election, the referendum, or the moratorium or election up there?"