A year ago, the most intense campaign in Michigan was not the race for the presidency, but the battle over whether to change the state constitution to allow research using stem cells taken from human embryos created in fertility clinics.
Both sides spent millions to try and sway the voters, but in the end, Michigan voted decisively (53 percent to 47 percent) to allow embryonic stem-cell research. That, you might think, settled that.
You might also have thought that state legislators would have their plates full trying to cope with the ongoing state budget crisis.
Especially since they were still squabbling last week over the budget for the current fiscal year, a document that was legally supposed to be passed and signed no later than Sept. 30.
But no. There is a small band of lawmakers in both the State House and Senate dedicated to either rolling back the will of the people -- or throwing enough restrictions in the way that stem-cell research would be practically impossible.
Former U.S. Rep. Joe Schwarz, R-Battle Creek, perhaps said it best: "They couldn't stop it at the ballot box, so they're trying to stop it by throwing a regulatory banner at the research," he said.
The effort in the State House is more transparent. Earlier this month, a group of 23 mostly Republican lawmakers introduced a joint resolution calling for yet another constitutional amendment that would essentially repeal the one passed last year.
Their amendment would say that any fertilized egg has the same rights as any adult person in the state, and would appear to make embryonic stem-cell research tantamount to murder.
What is unclear is whether the lab technicians who routinely discard such embryos would also be guilty of homicide.
However, it is clear that the joint resolution has essentially no chance of being placed on the ballot, since the lower House is solidly controlled by mostly pro-stem cell Democrats. What's happening in the State Senate, however, has more potential to be disruptive.
Republicans control the senate, and Sen. Tom George, R-Kalamazoo, who chairs the Health Policy Committee, is a fervent opponent of embryonic stem-cell research.
He has been holding hearings on a six-bill package that he says is necessary to regulate stem-cell research in the state. His argument is that legislators have a responsibility to "define and clarify" how the constitutional amendment would work.
But stem-cell supporters say that's not what is going on here. They say his package of bills is designed to thwart such research by making it impossible. For example: One of his bills would require researchers to determine that an embryo would have less than a 50 percent chance of survival before using it for research.
Scientists say, however that it is impossible to determine that. Far fewer than half of all implanted embryos actually become babies. And under the current law, all embryos donated to stem-cell research have no chance of becoming babies anyway. If not donated, they were destined to be discarded or destroyed by the clinics.
The state's leading stem-cell researcher, Dr. Sean Morrison, said what the Senate was trying to do directly contradicts the measure voters approved less than a year ago.
"Those bills would impede the development of the life sciences sector in Michigan, by making it illegal to pursue mainstream forms of medical research that are widely accepted throughout the rest of the country," Dr. Morrison, who heads the University of Michigan's Center for Stem Cell Biology, told the Associated Press.
Last fall, those supporting Proposal 2, the amendment allowing embryonic stem-cell research, said that allowing it would be economically beneficial to Michigan. That pledge seems to have been true. As of last week, the University of Michigan had been awarded $6.8 million in federal stimulus grants for this research.
Scientists believe that embryonic stem-cell research holds great potential for helping arrest and reverse the effects of various diseases, such as Parkinson's and macular degeneration, and perhaps even help repair crippling spinal cord injuries.
Whether the Senate will, in fact, pass any bills trying to inhibit stem-cell research is unclear. Even if they do, their chances of success in the House are likely to be poor, and they could also face a veto from Gov. Jennifer Granholm.
Supporters of stem-cell research say that all this may be moot, because any attempt to prevent or limit stem-cell research is likely unconstitutional. Proposal 2 says that state law cannot "prevent, restrict or discourage stem-cell research, future therapies and cures."
One might think with the state's economy and its finances in deep crisis, Michigan lawmakers would have better things to do.
Print this story
E-mail this story
